Under the Construction Contracts Act 2013 (‘CCA 2013’) a party can refer a payment dispute to adjudication. Section 6 of the CCA 2013 defines a payment dispute as ‘any dispute relating to payment arising under the construction contract.’ In the UK, although the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (as amended) (‘HGCRA 1996’) permits any dispute to be referred to adjudication, it too confines that right to ‘a dispute arising under the contract.’ In Ireland, there is no adjudication case law regarding the parameters of the meaning ‘under the contract.’ A question arises as to…

Earlier today, the High Court published an ex-tempore judgment in Finnegan Construction Limited v Killycard Developments Limited [2024] IEHC 752, which was given by Simons J on 17 December 2024. The High Court enforced an adjudicator’s decision. However, an issue arose as to the treatment of interest.

Previously, Aakon Construction Services Limited v Pure Fitout Associated Limited [2021] IEHC 619, considered whether, in the absence of the adjudicator having made any provision for the payment of interest, the successful party could rely on s.22 of the Courts Act 1981 to claim interest. The court held that it is a…

Most construction contracts contain provisions purporting to bar a party’s claim for failure to comply with the notice provisions in the contract. These provisions are referred to as conditions precedent or time bars. Typically, such provisions are along the lines that should a party fail to issue a notice within a certain specified timeframe of becoming aware (or should have become aware) of event giving rise to a claim, the other party is discharged from all liability in connection with that claim.

Often disputes arise regarding whether a particular provision is a condition precedent. In Tata Consultancy Services Limited v …

Shortly before Christmas, the Chairperson of the Construction Contracts Adjudication Panel published the Eighth Annual Report (‘Report’) concerning the Construction Contracts Adjudication Panel. The Report covers the period from the 26 July 2023 to 25 July 2024.

In that period there were 101 applications for the appointment of an adjudicator with the Chairperson appointing 93 adjudicators. The appointments led to 74 issued decisions. Some disputes were settled (approximately 12%) or withdrawn after an adjudicator was appointed. The number of adjudicators appointed in this period represents the highest number of appointments since the Construction Contracts Act 2013 (the…

The use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools and, specifically, GenAI chatbots such as ChatGPT, Google’s Bard or Claude is becoming increasingly common in the legal industry. GenAI tools have the potential to enable increases in efficiency, accuracy and productivity across a number of legal tasks and activities. However, users must be aware of, and take into account, the risks and challenges which exist with these tools.

The Technology and Construction Solicitor’s Association (TECSA) is a leading Adjudicator Nominating Body in England and Wales. Adjudicators on its panel include Sir Rupert Jackson who was the judge…

Introduction

The Construction Contracts Act 2013 (Appointed Day) Order 2016 provides that the effective date of the Construction Contracts Act 2013 (Act) is 25 July 2016. Following this date, all ‘’construction contracts’’ as defined by the Act are subject to the well-known statutory timelines for payment with a corresponding right to seek adjudication in the event of a payment dispute.  

This past summer marked the eighth year that the Act was fully operational in the Irish construction sector. Given the growing popularity of adjudication, stakeholders in the Irish construction sector are continuing utilise adjudication as a method…

Introduction

In our last blog post we discussed mitigation and construction disputes. We looked at a situation where a contractor refuses to rectify defective work and the employer engages another contractor to undertake the remediation. Subsequently, the employer seeks to recoup the remediation costs from the initial contractor. In those circumstances, we looked at the importance of considering whether the employer has mitigated its loss. Continuing the theme of defending an employer’s claim, in this post we consider betterment. A betterment defence is often run in tandem with mitigation.

Betterment relates to the correction of a defect in such a…

Disputes often arise in relation to defects. For example, an employer may contend that a particular work item is defective, while a contractor may argue that the item is not defective. Usually, the employer will request that the defective work is remediated by the contractor. If the contractor fails or refuses to remediate the work item, the employer will engage others to carry out the remediation and seek to recover the costs from the contractor. Similarly, an employer who terminates the contractor’s employment will engage another contractor to complete the project and seek to recoup the additional costs from the…